<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Ontario Court of Appeal Decision Just Made Most Termination Clauses Invalid	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thehumlawfirm.ca/ontario-court-of-appeal-decision-just-made-most-termination-clauses-invalid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thehumlawfirm.ca/ontario-court-of-appeal-decision-just-made-most-termination-clauses-invalid/</link>
	<description>Canadian Workplace &#38; Employment Law, Professional Regulation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 14:16:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ontario Court of Appeal decision Rhaman v Cannon Design Architecture: How employment agreements are written can leave employers with costly consequences - Hum Law Firm - Employment Lawyers Toronto		</title>
		<link>https://thehumlawfirm.ca/ontario-court-of-appeal-decision-just-made-most-termination-clauses-invalid/#comment-67</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ontario Court of Appeal decision Rhaman v Cannon Design Architecture: How employment agreements are written can leave employers with costly consequences - Hum Law Firm - Employment Lawyers Toronto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 14:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thehumlawfirm.ca/?p=10741#comment-67</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Dunphy’s initial decision gave employers a glimmer of hope following the ground-breaking case Waksdale v Swegon North America Inc. (“Waksdale”), which invalidated many termination provisions in Ontario. In Waksdale, the ONCA [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Dunphy’s initial decision gave employers a glimmer of hope following the ground-breaking case Waksdale v Swegon North America Inc. (“Waksdale”), which invalidated many termination provisions in Ontario. In Waksdale, the ONCA [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: I was terminated without cause. What is the difference between common law reasonable notice and termination and severance pay under Ontario’s Employment Standards Act? - Hum Law Firm - Employment Lawyers Toronto		</title>
		<link>https://thehumlawfirm.ca/ontario-court-of-appeal-decision-just-made-most-termination-clauses-invalid/#comment-27</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[I was terminated without cause. What is the difference between common law reasonable notice and termination and severance pay under Ontario’s Employment Standards Act? - Hum Law Firm - Employment Lawyers Toronto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 21:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thehumlawfirm.ca/?p=10741#comment-27</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] If you have a written employment agreement, your entitlements will depend on whether your employment agreement has valid termination provisions. If the termination provisions are enforceable, you may only be entitled to your ESA minimum entitlements. Bear in mind that many termination provisions in Ontario are now unenforceable because of the decision in Waksdale v Swegon North America Inc. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] If you have a written employment agreement, your entitlements will depend on whether your employment agreement has valid termination provisions. If the termination provisions are enforceable, you may only be entitled to your ESA minimum entitlements. Bear in mind that many termination provisions in Ontario are now unenforceable because of the decision in Waksdale v Swegon North America Inc. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
