<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What are the standards that employers are responsible for when it comes to harassment?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thehumlawfirm.ca/what-are-the-standards-that-employers-are-responsible-for-when-it-comes-to-harassment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thehumlawfirm.ca/what-are-the-standards-that-employers-are-responsible-for-when-it-comes-to-harassment/</link>
	<description>Canadian Workplace &#38; Employment Law, Professional Regulation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 02:09:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Your employer can’t bully you! How courts are recognizing mistreatment of employees in damages awards - Hum Law Firm - Employment Lawyers Toronto		</title>
		<link>https://thehumlawfirm.ca/what-are-the-standards-that-employers-are-responsible-for-when-it-comes-to-harassment/#comment-64</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Your employer can’t bully you! How courts are recognizing mistreatment of employees in damages awards - Hum Law Firm - Employment Lawyers Toronto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 02:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thehumlawfirm.ca/?p=11812#comment-64</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The ONSC opined the employer’s abusive conduct was “malicious, oppressive and high-handed” and ordered the employer to pay moral damages of $75,000 plus punitive damages of $25,000, for a total of $100,000. Additionally, the court awarded an additional $50,000 for the employer’s violation of the Ontario Human Rights Code, because the abusive conduct was related to the prohibited grounds. For a more detailed discussion, please see our article, What Are the Standards that Employers Are Responsible for When It Comes to Harassment. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The ONSC opined the employer’s abusive conduct was “malicious, oppressive and high-handed” and ordered the employer to pay moral damages of $75,000 plus punitive damages of $25,000, for a total of $100,000. Additionally, the court awarded an additional $50,000 for the employer’s violation of the Ontario Human Rights Code, because the abusive conduct was related to the prohibited grounds. For a more detailed discussion, please see our article, What Are the Standards that Employers Are Responsible for When It Comes to Harassment. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Top 10 errors employers make - Hum Law Firm - Employment Lawyers Toronto		</title>
		<link>https://thehumlawfirm.ca/what-are-the-standards-that-employers-are-responsible-for-when-it-comes-to-harassment/#comment-58</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Top 10 errors employers make - Hum Law Firm - Employment Lawyers Toronto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 18:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thehumlawfirm.ca/?p=11812#comment-58</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] employer could be liable for the harassment under certain circumstances. For example, if the harasser is a manager, who is a directing mind of the employer, the employer [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] employer could be liable for the harassment under certain circumstances. For example, if the harasser is a manager, who is a directing mind of the employer, the employer [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
